This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody — Head-to-Head Comparison
Quick verdict: Continue edges ahead with a 4.4/5 rating vs 4.4/5. Continue stands out for fully open-source with no vendor lock-in, while Sourcegraph Cody excels at unmatched codebase context through sourcegraph's search engine.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Continue | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|
| Open-source with full code transparency | ✓ | — |
| Support for any LLM provider or local model | ✓ | — |
| Tab autocomplete in VS Code and JetBrains | ✓ | — |
| AI chat with codebase context | ✓ | — |
| Custom slash commands and prompts | ✓ | — |
| Configurable context providers | ✓ | — |
| Inline code editing with diff preview | ✓ | — |
| Model routing (different models per task) | ✓ | — |
| Team configuration sharing via config file | ✓ | — |
| Self-hosted deployment option | ✓ | — |
| Entire codebase context via Sourcegraph search | — | ✓ |
| Cross-repository code understanding | — | ✓ |
| AI chat with codebase-aware responses | — | ✓ |
| Inline code completion with deep context | — | ✓ |
| Code explanation across complex paths | — | ✓ |
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Continue | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|
| Starting price | $0 | $0/month |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Mid tier | Varies | $9/month |
Pros & Cons
Continue
Pros
- Fully open-source with no vendor lock-in
- Works with any LLM including free local models
- Highly customizable with slash commands and context providers
- Self-hostable for complete data privacy
Cons
- Requires more setup than plug-and-play alternatives
- Quality depends entirely on which model you configure
- Smaller community than Copilot though growing rapidly
- No managed cloud option for zero-setup experience
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- Unmatched codebase context through Sourcegraph's search engine
- Cross-repository understanding for large organizations
- Flexible LLM provider choice (Claude, GPT, etc.)
- Excellent for understanding and reviewing complex codebases
Cons
- Full power requires Sourcegraph platform setup
- Less competitive for pure inline completion speed
- Enterprise features require significant infrastructure
- Smaller community compared to Copilot or Cursor
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Continue if:
- Teams wanting full control over their AI coding assistant with no vendor lock-in
- Privacy-focused organizations needing a self-hosted AI coding solution
Try Continue
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if:
- Large engineering organizations needing AI that understands their entire codebase
- Code reviewers who need deep cross-repository context for thorough reviews
Try Sourcegraph Cody
